Several well-known betting systems exist. Here are the most common ones, with worked examples so you can see exactly how they function:
Martingale System
The idea: double your bet after every loss. When you eventually win, you recover all previous losses plus a profit equal to your original bet.
Example: You start with a 100 INR bet on red. You lose. Next bet: 200 INR. Lose again. Next: 400 INR. You win. Total wagered: 700 INR. Total returned: 800 INR (400 bet + 400 winnings). Net profit: 100 INR.
The catch? It sounds clean on paper. In practice, a losing streak of just seven spins takes your bet from 100 INR to 12,800 INR. Most tables have maximum bet limits that will stop you from doubling further. And even without table limits, the risk of a long losing streak is real. The Martingale does not change the odds. It changes the shape of your risk: many small wins, but the occasional devastating loss.
Fibonacci System
The idea: follow the Fibonacci sequence (1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21...) for your bet sizing. After a loss, move one step forward. After a win, move two steps back.
Example with a 50 INR base unit: Bet 50, lose. Bet 50, lose. Bet 100, lose. Bet 150, win. Move back two steps, bet 50.
This system is less aggressive than Martingale. Bets grow more slowly. But the same fundamental limitation applies: no sequence of bet sizes can change the underlying probability of each spin.
D'Alembert System
The idea: increase your bet by one unit after a loss, decrease by one unit after a win.
Example with a 100 INR base: Bet 100, lose. Bet 200, lose. Bet 300, win. Bet 200, win. Bet 100.
D'Alembert is the gentlest of the three. It does not chase losses as aggressively. For players who want some structure without wild swings, it is a reasonable framework. But again, it does not alter the house edge.
The honest summary: Betting systems can make your sessions more structured and help you stick to a budget. They cannot turn roulette into a profitable activity over time. If someone tells you otherwise, that is a red flag.